Myles M. Mattenson
ATTORNEY AT LAW 5550 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 200 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone (818) 313-9060 Facsimile (818) 313-9260 Email: MMM@MattensonLaw.com Web: http://www.MattensonLaw.com |
Attention Laundromat And Route-operators: The Irs Is Watching You! |
|
|
Attention Laundromat And Route-operators: As a result of examinations of various businesses or market segments by IRS district offices, the IRS has developed a specialized auditing approach for approximately 80 industries known as the Market Segment Specialization Program (MSSP). The program is designed to develop the expertise of agents in auditing specific types of business or market segment. As part of the MSSP approach, the IRS has also issued Market Segment Guidelines which have been developed by the IRS in consultation with industry representatives, that address recurring tax issues, to a particular industry. The industries or market segments upon which the IRS has focused under the MSSP includes, to name a few, bail bondsmen, casino gambling, car washing and detailing, ministers, attorneys, plastic surgeons, and laundromats! The MSSP focuses on industries that can receive a substantial amount of their income in cash, as well as industries that may not be fully paying employment taxes for their workers (more on this subject next month). In addition to the audit activity undertaken in the MSSP, the IRS also monitors cash businesses through the vehicle of the Currency Transaction Report (CTR). The Bank Secrecy Act requires financial institutions to report currency transactions of more than $10,000.00 to the Internal Revenue Service. Although the law was initially established to principally aid federal authorities in their effort to control the flow of currency generated from illegal activities such as narcotics, CRTs have also proven to be helpful in catching taxpayers seeking to evade taxes regarding cash transactions. A CTR must be prepared by your bank for any currency transaction of more than $10,000.00 or, for that matter, for multiple currency transactions totalling more than $10,000.00 in any one day. It is a violation of federal law to arrange a transaction with a financial institution specifically to avoid the CTR requirement. An illustration of such a violation would be the act of breaking a single deposit of more than $10,000.00 in cash into a series of small cash deposits or reducing the amount of the deposit to less than $10,000.00 when told of reporting requirements by the financial institution. An exemption from large currency transaction reporting can be provided by a financial institution under certain circumstances. The effect of the exemption is to raise the dollar amount which can be involved in the currency transaction before the reporting requirement kicks in. Financial institutions will consider raising the dollar amount of the currency transaction reporting requirement for retail businesses primarily engaged in providing goods directly to consumers, amusement parks, bars and restaurants, hotels, theaters, and vending machine companies. Banks can, however, lower the dollar amount of such currency transaction reporting requirements without notification to the bank customer, particularly if normal cash deposits drop to a lower level. In a news release issued by the U.S. Attorneys Office in San Diego, earlier this year, Wayne McEwan, Chief of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, stated "that the IRS will vigorously prosecute businessmen who succumb to the temptation of skimming cash receipts." This comment was made in connection with the agreement of a San Diego route operator to plead guilty to charges of tax evasion. The defendant entering the plea was the president and sole owner of a San Diego based Sub Chapter-S corporation operating over 10,000 coin operated washers and dryers installed in, among other locations, "apartment buildings, condominium complexes and college dormitories, throughout San Diego County." After collection of the gross receipts, monies from the various machines were deposited directly at Wells Fargo Bank. According to the news release, "Rather than receive a credit for the amount of the entire deposit, [the defendant] directed Wells Fargo Bank to return exactly $7,000.00 in cash from each of the first five deposits his company made each month." Although this $35,000.00 would be reflected as "less cash" on bank deposit slips, the amount would not appear on monthly bank statements. As a result, the defendant received approximately $420,000.00 each year for a period of years from Wells Fargo Bank that was not indicated on his bank statements. The news release further states that the corporate return would only reflect "the amount of income appearing on the Wells Fargo Bank statements. In other words, he failed to declare all of the cash he received back form the individual deposits. As a result, he evaded the payment of $1,432,622.00 in taxes which would have flowed through to his personal returns." According to the prosecutor in this matter, Assistant U.S. Attorney Phillip L.B. Halbern, the defendant paid the government $5,100,335.12 in back taxes, penalties and interest, together with a $100,000.00 criminal fine. In addition, the defendant was sentenced on or about April 24, 1995 to a two year term in prison. Skimming is a dangerous game which can have devastating economic and emotional consequences for you! A failure to report all your cash receipts may result in a visit to your laundromat by a fellow in a business suit with an attache case. And he won't be coming to see you to do his laundry! [This column is intended to provide general information only and is not intended to provide specific legal advice; if you have a specific question regarding the law, you should contact an attorney of your choice. Suggestions for topics to be discussed in this column are welcome.] Reprinted from New Era Magazine Myles M. Mattenson © 1995-2002 |